Gregg v. Georgia

Results: 132



#Item
31ISSUE	
  18.1	
    	
    

ISSUE  18.1      

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.bjcl.org

Language: English - Date: 2013-06-25 00:49:53
32PLEASE NOTE: In most BUT NOT ALL instances, the page and line numbering of bills on this web site correspond to the page and line numbering of the official printed version of the bills. Senate Engrossed

PLEASE NOTE: In most BUT NOT ALL instances, the page and line numbering of bills on this web site correspond to the page and line numbering of the official printed version of the bills. Senate Engrossed

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.azag.gov

Language: English - Date: 2014-10-24 18:56:17
33II. Capital Punishment in Arizona History In Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S[removed]), the United States Supreme Court held that the death penalty as administered violated the United States Constitution Eighth Amendment pr

II. Capital Punishment in Arizona History In Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S[removed]), the United States Supreme Court held that the death penalty as administered violated the United States Constitution Eighth Amendment pr

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.azag.gov

Language: English - Date: 2014-10-24 18:56:17
34II. Capital Punishment in Arizona History In Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S[removed]), the United States Supreme Court held that the death penalty as administered violated the United States Constitution Eighth Amendment pr

II. Capital Punishment in Arizona History In Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S[removed]), the United States Supreme Court held that the death penalty as administered violated the United States Constitution Eighth Amendment pr

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.azag.gov

Language: English - Date: 2014-10-24 18:56:17
35IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA November 9, 2007 ORDER IT IS ORDERED that Alabama Pattern Jury Instructions – Criminal for the penalty phase of capital proceedings be

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA November 9, 2007 ORDER IT IS ORDERED that Alabama Pattern Jury Instructions – Criminal for the penalty phase of capital proceedings be

Add to Reading List

Source URL: ali.state.al.us

Language: English - Date: 2014-09-11 12:21:34
36INSTRUCTIONS REGARDING AGGRAVATING FACTORS I. [TO BE GIVEN IN NON-BIFURCATED TRIAL BEFORE GUILT DELIBERATION] A. If after consideration of the guilt of the defendant you

INSTRUCTIONS REGARDING AGGRAVATING FACTORS I. [TO BE GIVEN IN NON-BIFURCATED TRIAL BEFORE GUILT DELIBERATION] A. If after consideration of the guilt of the defendant you

Add to Reading List

Source URL: ali.state.al.us

Language: English - Date: 2014-09-11 12:21:39
37NUMBER 40  Death Penalty for Juveniles is Cruel and Unusual Roper v. Simmons

NUMBER 40 Death Penalty for Juveniles is Cruel and Unusual Roper v. Simmons

Add to Reading List

Source URL: dls.virginia.gov

Language: English - Date: 2005-04-06 10:43:47
38Office of the Attorney General State of Arizona Capital Case Commission Final Report December 31, 2002

Office of the Attorney General State of Arizona Capital Case Commission Final Report December 31, 2002

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.azag.gov

Language: English - Date: 2014-10-24 18:56:17
39IV. Capital Case Commission Deliberations and Recommendations 1. Capital Litigation Resources Legislation

IV. Capital Case Commission Deliberations and Recommendations 1. Capital Litigation Resources Legislation

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.azag.gov

Language: English - Date: 2014-10-24 18:56:17
40[removed]Walker v. Georgia[removed])

[removed]Walker v. Georgia[removed])

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.supremecourt.gov

Language: English - Date: 2008-10-20 12:12:34